Naming standards is a crucial thing in our job! This post is about time spent in naming standards, possible costs of developing naming standards and possible costs not to have a well-thought-out naming standard for the orchestration projects. First I need to say, our basic aim is to provide organization-wide uniqueness for a configuration. This is the first step in automation. If something about the naming standard is not well-considered, most probably the orchestration project will not fit in the budget. It will cost you a lot of reworks and you know how the story goes on after that particular point. In fact, on average every person/hour spent on qualitative work items saves 7.7 person/hours of quantitative work items globally. orchestration projects are not an exception! As every software project needs relatively constant requirements to decrease costs. Above all software projects, orchestration projects are the easiest one to solidify the requirements because responsi...
Swiss Army knife for system administrators